Johnson & Johnson is one of the most-litigated talc defendants in the United States. The company’s signature talc product, Johnson’s Baby Powder, has been documented in publicly filed litigation as having been contaminated with asbestos fiber during the asbestos-era mining and processing of its talc supply. J&J discontinued domestic sales of talc-based Johnson’s Baby Powder in 2020 and worldwide sales in 2023, reformulating to a cornstarch base.

Publicly filed mesothelioma and ovarian cancer litigation has produced numerous plaintiff verdicts, including a widely reported 2018 multi-plaintiff verdict. A 2024 Connecticut verdict involving GE phenolic compound allegedly contaminated with J&J talc exemplifies the cross-product exposure pathway where J&J talc appeared as a contaminant in industrial supply chains beyond its consumer/cosmetic distribution.

J&J’s talc supply chain in the asbestos era drew primarily from mines in Vermont and Italy. The contamination history is documented in publicly filed depositions, internal corporate memoranda produced in discovery, and FDA records related to testing methodology disputes.

Worker exposure

Workers exposed to Johnson & Johnson’s talc products fall into two broad categories: (a) industrial workers at facilities that used the company’s industrial-grade talc as a filler, extender, or processing aid in ceramic, paper, paint, rubber, roofing, foundry, or plastics operations; and (b) cosmetic and personal-care workers at facilities that handled cosmetic-grade talc during manufacturing, packaging, or beauty-industry use.

For mesothelioma case evaluation, the industrial talc-worker exposure pathway is typically the strongest litigation profile — these workers handled the contaminated material in bulk over years, with documented breathing-zone exposure and clear chain-of-custody back to Johnson & Johnson as the supplier.

Worker rights

If you or a family member handled Johnson & Johnson talc products and has been diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos-related disease, you may have a legal claim. Speak with O’Brien Law Firm — (314) 936-2956 for a free, confidential case review.


Plants by State

Johnson & Johnson operated plants across multiple U.S. states. Detailed premises information is available on the following state jobsite pages:


References reflect what has been alleged or documented in publicly filed asbestos litigation. This information does not constitute a finding of fact or liability.

Documented in Public Court Records

According to publicly filed federal asbestos litigation records (reviewed via CourtListener/RECAP), Johnson & Johnson has been named in 400+ documented asbestos dockets filed between 2001 and 2025 across U.S. district courts.

In these publicly filed cases, Johnson & Johnson is most often named alongside other companies frequently sued as co-defendants in the same asbestos actions, including Imerys Talc America, Pfizer, Cyprus Amax Minerals, General Electric, Honeywell International, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Mckesson.

Case counts and co-defendant associations are drawn from publicly filed litigation records and reflect allegations, not findings of liability, which is determined case by case.