Documented Asbestos Litigation

According to publicly filed asbestos litigation records (reviewed via CourtListener/RECAP), Crouse Hinds has been named as a defendant in 100+ documented asbestos dockets filed between 2001 and 2017 — concentrated in the federal asbestos multidistrict litigation (In re: Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, MDL 875, E.D. Pennsylvania) and other U.S. district courts. Plaintiffs allege that Crouse Hinds manufactured or supplied asbestos-containing products — Explosion-proof electrical conduit fittings, control boxes and light fixtures using asbestos sealing compounds (Chico A05, Chico X6) and packing material. — and that workers were exposed while handling or working around them.

Companies Frequently Named Alongside Crouse Hinds

In these publicly filed cases, Crouse Hinds is most often named as a co-defendant alongside General Electric, Beazer East, Goodyear Tire & Rubber, Allen Bradley, Crane Co., Rapid American, IMO Industries, Ingersoll-Rand — reflecting the multi-defendant nature of asbestos litigation, in which plaintiffs name the range of companies connected to their exposure history.

Occupational Exposure and Asbestos Disease

Asbestos exposure is associated with mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer, typically after a latency period of two to five decades. Workers in industrial trades — maintenance, construction, shipyard, power generation, and manufacturing — are among those most frequently represented in asbestos litigation.

The litigation record above reflects allegations from publicly filed asbestos cases; these are plaintiff allegations, not findings of fact, and liability is determined case by case. An attorney experienced in asbestos litigation can evaluate whether a specific work and exposure history supports a claim involving Crouse Hinds.