Documented Asbestos Litigation

According to publicly filed asbestos litigation records (reviewed via CourtListener/RECAP), Cirrus Enterprises has been named as a defendant in 100+ documented asbestos dockets filed between 2008 and 2019 across U.S. district courts. In these cases Cirrus Enterprises is named not as a manufacturer of asbestos products but in a premises/contractor capacity: Peripheral defendant in an aircraft/aerospace asbestos personal-injury case (Thrash v. Cirrus Enterprises LLC, N.D. Cal. 2017) alongside Boeing/Lockheed/Honeywell/UTC; role unverified but aerospace context points to a site/aviation-services entity, dismissed early by stipulation. Plaintiffs allege exposure to asbestos-containing materials at its facilities, or that it installed or distributed asbestos products made by other companies.

Companies Frequently Named Alongside Cirrus Enterprises

In these publicly filed cases, Cirrus Enterprises is most often named as a co-defendant alongside United Technologies, General Electric, Honeywell International, IMO Industries, Union Carbide, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber, Rohr, CBS — reflecting the multi-defendant nature of asbestos litigation, in which plaintiffs name the range of companies connected to their exposure history.

Occupational Exposure and Asbestos Disease

Asbestos exposure is associated with mesothelioma, asbestosis, and asbestos-related lung cancer, typically after a latency period of two to five decades. Workers in industrial trades — maintenance, construction, shipyard, power generation, and manufacturing — are among those most frequently represented in asbestos litigation.

The litigation record above reflects allegations from publicly filed asbestos cases; these are plaintiff allegations, not findings of fact, and liability is determined case by case. An attorney experienced in asbestos litigation can evaluate whether a specific work and exposure history supports a claim involving Cirrus Enterprises.